Bitcoin has a reduced risk of collapse Unlike traditional currencies that rely on authorities. When currencies collapse, it contributes to hyperinflation or the wipeout of someone’s savings in an instant. Bitcoin exchange rate isn’t controlled by any government and is a digital money available globally.
Bitcoin isn’t hard to carry. A billion Bucks in the Bitcoin can be stored on a memory stick and placed in one’s pocket. It’s that simple to transfer Bitcoins compared to paper money.
The general idea is that Bitcoins Are ‘mined’… interesting expression here… by solving an increasingly difficult mathematical formula -more difficult as more Bitcoins are ‘mined’ into existence; yet again intriguing- on a computer. Once created, the new Bitcoin is set into an electronic ‘wallet’. It’s then feasible to exchange real goods or Fiat money for Bitcoins… and vice versa. Additionally, as there is no central issuer of Bitcoins, it is all highly distributed, hence resistant to being ‘managed’ by jurisdiction.
Naturally proponents of Bitcoin, Those who benefit from the growth of Bitcoin, insist fairly loud that ‘for certain, Bitcoin is money’… and not just that, but ‘it’s the best money , the money of their future’, etc.. . Well, the proponents of Fiat shout as loudly that paper money is money… and we all know that Fiat paper isn’t money by any means, as it lacks the most important attributes of genuine cash. The question then is does Bitcoin even be eligible as money… never mind it being the cash of their future, or the best money ever.
Compared to Fiat, Bitcoin does not Do too badly as a medium of trade. Fiat is only accepted in the geographical domain of its issuer. Dollars aren’t any good in Europe etc.. Bitcoin is approved internationally. On the other hand, very few retailers now accept payment in Bitcoin. Unless the acceptance grows , Fiat wins… although at the cost of exchange between nations.
The first condition is a great deal Tougher; cash must be a stable store of value… now Bitcoins have gone out of a ‘value’ of $3.00 to around $1,000, in only a couple years. This is about as far from being a ‘stable store of value’; as you can buy! Indeed, such profits are an ideal example of a speculative boom… like Dutch tulip bulbs, or junior mining companies, or Nortel stocks. There is so much for you to learn about bitcoin revolution, and we certainly can guide you in this area. However, one really important distinction here directly relates to your own goals. Just be sure you choose those items that will serve your needs the most. Specifically how they effect what you do is one thing you need to carefully consider. But let’s keep going due to the fact we have some excellent tips for you to give serious attention.
Of course, Fiat fails here as well; As an instance, the US Dollar, the ‘main’ Fiat, has dropped over 95% of its value in a few decades… neither fiat nor Bitcoin qualify in the most important measure of money; the capacity to store value and preserve value through time. Actual money, which is Gold, has shown the ability to maintain value not only for centuries, but for eons. Neither Fiat nor Bitcoin has this critical capacity… both fail as money.
Finally, we come to the second Feature; that of being the numeraire. This is really intriguing, and we can see why both Bitcoin and Fiat fail as money, by looking closely at the question of the ‘numeraire’. Numeraire describes the use of cash to not just save value, but to in a way step, or compare worth. In Austrian economics, it is deemed impossible to really measure value; after all, value resides just in human comprehension… and how can anything else in consciousness actually be quantified? Nevertheless, through the principle of Mengerian market action, that is interaction between offer and bid, market prices can be established… if only momentarily… and this industry price is expressed in terms of the numeraire, the most marketable good, that’s money.
So how do we set the worth of Fiat… ? Through the idea of ‘buying power’… which is, the worth of Fiat depends upon what it can be exchanged for… a so called ‘basket of goods’. However, his clearly implies that Fiat has no significance of its own, but instead value flows from the worth of their goods and services it might be exchanged for. Causality flows from the merchandise ‘bought’ into the Fiat number. After all, what difference is there between a 1 Dollar invoice and a trillion Dollar bill, except that the amount printed on it… along with the purchasing power of the number?